Tag Archive for: drilling

U.S. oil production is set to end the year at a record pace of about 14 MMbpd as falling costs and better drilling efficiency overshadow low growth plans from publicly note down companies, Macquarie Group Ltd. analysts said in a note.

Macquarie be on one’s feet out among analysts last year with its projection of surge U.S. shale production and ultimately show to be true or correct. Its latest forecast comes as shale-oil operators are vowing to rein in production growth for a fourth straight year and consolidation in the industry presents headwinds to further growth. The U.S. government expects production to edge up to 13.2 MMbpd this year.

According to Macquarie’s projections, U.S. production is expect to reach approximately 14.5 million barrels per day by the year 2025. This forecast holds true even in the face of expectations for notably reduced crude prices. The modeling conducted by Macquarie suggests that despite the challenging market conditions and potential price fluctuations, the United States will continue to maintain a robust level of oil production in the coming years.

The prediction of U.S. production levels remaining steady at 14.5 million barrels per day by 2025 serves as a testament to the resilience and adaptability of the domestic oil industry. Despite the volatile nature of the market and the potential for lower prices impacting production, Macquarie’s analysis indicates a strong outlook for oil output in the United States. This projection not only underscores the nation’s significant role in the global oil market but also highlights the strategic planning and operational efficiency of U.S. oil producers in navigating challenging economic conditions.

Click here to read the full article
Source: Oil & Gas 360

If you have any questions or thoughts about the topic, feel free to contact us here or leave a comment below.

In its weekly release, Baker Hughes Company BKR stated that the U.S. Permian oil rig count was higher than the prior week’s figure. The rotary rig count, issued by BKR, is usually bring out in major newspapers and trade publications.

Baker Hughes’ data, issued at the end of every week since 1944, helps energy service providers gauge the overall business environment of the oil and gas industry. The number of active rigs and its comparison with the week-ago figure indicates the demand trajectory for the company’s oilfield services from exploration and production companies.

Rig Count Data in Detail

Total U.S. Rig Count Rises: The number of rigs engaged in the exploration and production of oil and natural gas in the United States was 629 in the week ended Mar 15. The figure is higher than theweek-ago count of 622. Although the figure increased in three of the prior five weeks, there has been a slowdown in drilling activities. Many analysts believe that shale producers are getting more efficient, requiring fewer rigs, while some doubt whether certain producers have enough prospective land to drill. The current national rig count is, however, lower than the year-ago level of 754.

Click here to read the full article
Source: yahoo!finance

If you have any questions or thoughts about the “Permian Oil Rig” topic, feel free to contact us here or leave a comment below.

Two American oil and gas companies have said they will merge in a $26bn (£21bn) deal. The latest in a wave of acquisitions designed to buy up the best land for drilling.

Diamondback Energy has agreed to buy Endeavor Energy Resources in a takeover. That will create a company with a value of about $50bn (£40bn).

The surge in merger activity within the energy sector has been largely fueled by the rise in oil prices following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The escalating tensions and subsequent economic uncertainties have prompted companies to capitalize on their increased profits by expanding their operations and boosting output.

In an effort to maintain their competitive edge and capitalize on the current market conditions, energy companies are looking to consolidate their resources through mergers and acquisitions.

Despite the short-term economic benefits of increased production, experts warn of the long-term consequences of further fossil fuel development.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) has cautioned. That continued investment in new fossil fuel projects could exacerbate global warming beyond safe limits. As the world grapples with the urgent need to transition to cleaner sources of energy. The pursuit of short-term gains through increased oil production may compromise efforts to mitigate the impacts of climate change.

The current merger frenzy within the energy sector underscores the complex trade-offs between economic growth and environmental sustainability.

Click here to read the full article
Source: The Guardian

If you have any questions or thoughts about the “oil companies” topic, feel free to contact us here or leave a comment below.

A Bit Of A Ghost

The Utah’s oil boom: Jim Finley is a bit of a ghost. Outside of oil industry circles, few people have probably ever heard of the man. He rarely speaks in public.

Utah's oil boom

One exception was in October 2021. When Finley the CEO of Texas-based Finley Resources. Presented to a coalition of seven oil-producing counties in eastern Utah. Following his speech, coalition board members and staff applauded Finley for his investments in Utah’s oil-rich Uinta Basin, and thanked him for making time to speak. One person noted that he is a particularly difficult man to get hold of.

“Sometimes nobody knows where I am,” Finley said.

“On purpose,” someone else chimed in. Finley chuckled.

A Key Role

The Texas oilman has played a key role. In spearheading the kind of oil boom that has long evaded the remote basin. In just over a decade, he’s become one of the top producers in the Uinta. And is now playing an outsize role in shaping Utah’s energy future.

Finley has thrown his support behind a controversial rail line that would make it easier for him and the basin’s five other producers to export oil to out-of-state markets, while simultaneously boosting export capacity via trucking and existing rail. He has his fingers in every aspect of basin production, from drilling oil and mining sand for hydraulic fracturing to operating a transloading facility and a growing fleet of oil trains. Powerful political allies have helped him expand his empire, primarily by funneling public money toward infrastructure projects that benefit the oil sector.

Chris Kuveke, a researcher at BailoutWatch, a watchdog group that provided HuffPost with extensive research on Finley’s portfolio and operations, called Finley “the mastermind” of the basin’s current oil boom.

“He has a long history of using campaign finance and lobbying as influence to get his projects where he wants them to be,” Kuveke said. “And he knows what he’s doing. He has a serious track record of influencing the industry that he wants to grow, being a linchpin. And that’s what he’s doing in the Uinta.”

 

Click here to read the full article
Source: HUFFPOST

If you have any questions or thoughts about the Utah’s oil boom topic, feel free to contact us here or leave a comment below.

  • The oil and gas industry is undergoing its biggest-ever consolidation, according to Enverus.
  • Upstream merger and acquisition activity hit $144 billion in the fourth quarter alone. And $190 billion for 2023, both setting records.
  • Bids from Exxon Mobil, Chevron, and Occidental Petroleum were among the key deals fueling the record.

The upstream oil and gas sector is consolidating at a record pace. As companies race to secure longevity in the market.

Merger and acquisition activity among exploration and production companies hit $144 billion in the fourth quarter alone. And $190 billion for 2023, both setting records, according to analytics firm Enverus.

“Oil and gas is undergoing a historic consolidation wave comparable to what occurred in the late 1990s and early 2000s giving rise to the modern supermajors.” Senior Vice President Andrew Dittmar said in a press release. “After a decade of lowered investment in exploration and with the major US shale plays largely defined, M&A has become the preferred tool to replace declining reserves and secure longevity in these companies’ profitable upstream businesses.”

In the fourth quarter, bids from Exxon Mobil, Chevron, and Occidental Petroleum. Were among the key deals fueling the record-setting consolidation.

M&A activity was overwhelmingly focused on oil last year. Totaling $186 billion in deals, while $6 billion targeted gas, according to Enverus.

Interest in the latter will likely grow as the US industry is working on increasing its liquefied natural gas exports over the next three years.

Click here to read the full article
Source: yahoo!finance

If you have any questions or thoughts about the “Oil & Gas Industry” topic, feel free to contact us here or leave a comment below.

The Spree of Oil and Gas Topic. Last year was big for Texas oil companies as they jockeyed for access to petroleum-rich plots of the Permian Basin and branched into new territories.

Recent megadeals struck by Chevron and Exxon put pressure on others in the oil industry to catch the consolidation wave, potentially kicking off a new round of mergers and acquisitions that could have a profound impact on Houston for years to come. Additionally, milestone acquisitions made by Exxon and Occidental Petroleum in the carbon capture space also set the stage for Houston to be ground zero for the growing industry.

Exxon to buy Pioneer for $59.5 billion

Exxon said in October that it would buy Irving-based Pioneer Natural Resources for $59.5 billion in the oil giant’s largest deal since it merged with Mobil more than two decades ago. Expected to be settle in 2024, the deal would make Spring-based Exxon the largest operator in the Permian Basin of Texas and New Mexico and bring the company’s daily production to almost 4.5 million barrels of oil equivalent a day — 50% more than the next largest supermajor.

Source: Houston Chronicle

If you have any questions or thoughts about the Spree of Oil and Gas Topic, feel free to contact us here or leave a comment below.

DISCLAIMER: We are not financial advisors. The content on this website is for educational purposes only and merely cites our own personal opinions. In order to make the best financial decision that suits your own needs, you must conduct your own research and seek the advice of a licensed financial advisor if necessary. Know that all investments involve some form of risk and there is no guarantee that you will be successful in making, saving, or investing money; nor is there any guarantee that you won’t experience any loss when investing. Always remember to make smart decisions and do your own research!
The world of investments is vast, with opportunities spanning various industries. One lesser-known yet lucrative option for investors is putting money into Overriding Royalty Interests (ORRIs), particularly in regions with a robust history of energy production like Texas. In this comprehensive guide, we’ll delve into the intricacies of investing in ORRIs, exploring what they are, how they work, the potential advantages and risks, and crucial considerations for those eyeing a slice of the energy wealth.

Understanding Overriding Royalty Interests

Before delving into the investment potential, let’s establish a solid understanding of what Overriding Royalty Interests entail. An ORRI is essentially a share of the revenue generated from the extraction and production of minerals, such as oil and natural gas, from a specific piece of land. Unlike traditional royalties, ORRIs “override” the rights of the working interest owner, entitling the holder to a portion of the income generated, irrespective of property ownership.

Typically expressed as a percentage (e.g., 1% or 3%), the ORRI is calculated based on the gross proceeds from the sale of extracted minerals. This interest is often granted to individuals or entities other than the property owner, such as geologists, drilling companies, or industry professionals.

Mechanics of Overriding Royalty Interests

To grasp how ORRIs function, consider a scenario in the oil-rich landscapes of Texas:

  • A landowner leases their land to an oil and gas company for drilling and extraction.
  • The lease agreement outlines terms, including royalty rates shared between the landowner (lessor) and the company (lessee).
  • Suppose the landowner and company settle on a 20% royalty rate, meaning the landowner gets 20% of mineral revenue.
  • Now, assume an investor holds an overriding royalty interest of 3% on this property. This entitles them to 3% of the gross revenue, in addition to the landowner’s 20% royalty.
  • The remaining 77% of the revenue goes to the drilling company as the working interest.

Investors with ORRIs benefit from mineral extraction without dealing with operational costs or day-to-day activities, making it an enticing prospect for those seeking passive income.

Advantages of Overriding Royalty Interests

Investing in ORRIs offers several advantages for individuals looking to diversify their portfolios:

Passive Income Stream: ORRI holders enjoy a steady income stream without actively participating in operations, making it an attractive source of passive income.

Minimal Operational Responsibilities: Investors are not burdened with operational activities, expenses, or risks associated with drilling and production, minimizing involvement and risk exposure.

Potential for Profit: Regions like Texas, with a history of successful oil and gas production, offer potential for significant profits, attracting investors to the energy sector.

Challenges and Risks

While ORRIs present enticing advantages, investors should be aware of potential challenges and risks:

Market Volatility: The oil and gas industry is prone to price volatility, impacting ORRI profitability and income generation due to fluctuating energy prices.

Lease Terms and Royalty Rates: Unfavorable lease terms or royalty rates negotiated between the landowner and drilling company may reduce potential income for ORRI investors.

Environmental and Regulatory Concerns: Compliance with complex and evolving regulatory frameworks at federal, state, and local levels, along with addressing environmental concerns, poses challenges for ORRI owners.

Key Considerations for Investors

For those eyeing ORRIs as an investment opportunity, careful consideration is paramount:

Lease Negotiations: Thoroughly review and negotiate lease agreements to ensure favorable terms, royalty rates, and protection of investor interests. Professional guidance is invaluable in this process.

Legal and Tax Implications: Navigate the complex legal and tax aspects associated with ORRI ownership by seeking professional guidance. Understand the unique implications and potential tax benefits.

Due Diligence: Conduct comprehensive due diligence before investing. Evaluate profitability potential, stability of the drilling company, and environmental and regulatory factors impacting the investment.

ORRIs vs. Working Interests: Distinguish between overriding royalty interests (ORRIs) and working interests (WIs). While ORRIs offer passive income, WIs involve active participation in operations, bearing operational costs and risks.

 

Investing in Overriding Royalty Interests proves to be a compelling option for those seeking a slice of the lucrative energy sector. While it offers passive income and profit potential, investors must navigate market volatility, lease terms, and regulatory complexities. With careful consideration, thorough due diligence, and professional guidance, investors can unlock the wealth potential of ORRIs and contribute to the dynamic landscape of the energy industry.

 

If you have further questions related to the topic, feel free to reach out to us here.

North Dakota Mineral Resource Director said 2023 was a good year for the state’s oil and gas industry.

“Prices were good,” said Lynn Helms. “And the companies were able to attract enough frack crews, to get into the mid to upper teens.”

Helms said the companies weren’t as successful with drilling crews.

“There are still workforce issues,” Helms said.

Helms said the year began with North Dakota producing just over a million barrels of oil per day. He said the hope was to get to the 1.3 million barrel mark by the end of the year. He said those final production numbers aren’t in yet.

As for next year?

“2024 looks to be slower growth,” Helms said. “But people are pretty optimistic.”

North Dakota Pipeline Authority Director Justin Kringstad echoed Helms’ comments.

“In 2023, what stands out is the month we got down to 4 percent flaring,” Kringstad said. “We’re continuing to see dedication by all sides — producers, mid-stream companies — to stay on top of this.”

Click here to read the full article
Source: Prarie Public NewsRoom

If you have further questions related to the “Oil and Gas in North Dakota” topic, feel free to reach out to us here.

DISCLAIMER: We are not financial advisors. The content on this website is for educational purposes only and merely cites our own personal opinions. In order to make the best financial decision that suits your own needs, you must conduct your own research and seek the advice of a licensed financial advisor if necessary. Know that all investments involve some form of risk and there is no guarantee that you will be successful in making, saving, or investing money; nor is there any guarantee that you won’t experience any loss when investing. Always remember to make smart decisions and do your own research!

Mineral rights ownership is a complex and often lucrative aspect of real estate, offering landowners the opportunity to extract valuable resources like oil, gas, coal, and minerals from beneath their property. While mineral rights can provide financial benefits, they also come with environmental responsibilities. The extraction of these resources can have a significant impact on the environment. In this comprehensive guide, we will explore the environmental implications of mineral rights ownership, examining the potential consequences, regulatory frameworks, and strategies for responsible resource extraction.

Mineral rights ownership can be a source of significant income for landowners. However, the extraction of resources like oil, gas, and minerals can result in environmental consequences, ranging from habitat disruption to air and water pollution. Understanding the environmental impact of mineral rights ownership is essential for landowners, resource extraction companies, and policymakers to ensure responsible and sustainable resource management.

Understanding Mineral Rights Ownership

Mineral rights ownership, often referred to as subsurface rights, provides landowners with the legal authority to extract and profit from the minerals located beneath the surface of their property. These minerals can include a variety of valuable resources, such as oil, natural gas, coal, metals, and minerals.

It’s important to note that mineral rights can be severed from the surface rights, allowing a separate party to extract minerals. This division of ownership is a common occurrence in the real estate world, particularly in regions with significant mineral resources.

The Environmental Impact of Resource Extraction

Resource extraction, including the drilling, mining, and processing of minerals, can have a range of environmental impacts. It’s crucial to understand these impacts to make informed decisions regarding mineral rights ownership and resource extraction practices.

Land Disturbance and Erosion

Resource extraction often involves substantial land disturbance. Clearing land, constructing roads and drilling pads, and removing vegetation can lead to soil erosion, which can harm local ecosystems and water quality.

Water Contamination and Pollution

The extraction process can result in the release of pollutants into nearby water bodies. Chemicals used in drilling or mining, as well as the presence of naturally occurring contaminants in the subsurface, can contaminate groundwater and surface water.

Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Energy-intensive resource extraction activities, such as drilling and mining, can lead to air pollution. This pollution may include the release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), particulate matter, and greenhouse gases, contributing to climate change.

Habitat Disruption and Biodiversity Loss

The physical disturbance of land and the release of pollutants can disrupt local habitats, impacting plant and animal species. In some cases, resource extraction can lead to biodiversity loss and the endangerment of species.

Environmental Regulations and Compliance

Environmental regulations and compliance measures are in place to mitigate the environmental impact of resource extraction. These regulations can vary by location, resource type, and the specific activities involved in mineral rights ownership. Understanding and adhering to these regulations is essential for landowners and resource extraction companies.

Regulations may include:

  • Permitting Requirements: Resource extraction activities often require permits that outline specific conditions, safety measures, and environmental protections.
  • Environmental Impact Assessments: Environmental impact assessments may be necessary to evaluate the potential consequences of resource extraction and develop mitigation strategies.
  • Waste Management and Disposal: Regulations may dictate how waste materials, such as drilling muds and tailings, are managed and disposed of to prevent environmental harm.
  • Water Management: Guidelines for the responsible use and management of water resources, including water sourcing and recycling, are often included in regulations.
  • Air Quality Standards: Regulations may set limits on emissions and require the use of emission control technologies to reduce air pollution.

Mitigating Environmental Impact

Responsible and sustainable resource extraction practices can help mitigate the environmental impact of mineral rights ownership. Here are some key strategies:

Sustainable Practices

Adopting sustainable resource extraction practices, such as reduced-impact drilling techniques and responsible land reclamation, can minimize environmental consequences.

Environmental Assessments

Conducting comprehensive environmental assessments before and during resource extraction can help identify potential risks and develop mitigation strategies.

Reclamation and Remediation

Implement reclamation and remediation measures to restore the land to its natural state once resource extraction is complete. This can include re-vegetation, erosion control, and habitat restoration.

The Role of Technology

Advancements in technology have enabled more environmentally responsible resource extraction practices. For example, the use of cleaner energy sources, such as natural gas, can reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, technological innovations like hydraulic fracturing (fracking) have allowed for more efficient resource extraction with reduced environmental impact.

However, the deployment of such technologies must be accompanied by stringent regulatory oversight and compliance to ensure responsible practices.

Mineral rights ownership can provide landowners with valuable income opportunities, but it also carries significant environmental responsibilities. The extraction of resources like oil, gas, and minerals can result in a range of environmental impacts, from land disturbance to water pollution.

Responsible and sustainable resource extraction practices, combined with adherence to environmental regulations and oversight, can help mitigate these consequences and ensure the long-term health of local ecosystems and communities.

As technology continues to evolve, there are opportunities for more environmentally friendly resource extraction practices. Understanding the environmental impact of mineral rights ownership is essential for landowners, resource extraction companies, and policymakers to make informed decisions and contribute to responsible resource management. By taking a proactive approach to environmental considerations, landowners can achieve a balance between financial benefits and ecological stewardship in the world of mineral rights ownership.

 

Expanding its Asset Portfolio

Australian player entering Gulf of Mexico with new oil & gas acquisition. Australian oil and gas company Karoon Energy is in the process of diversifying and expanding its asset portfolio. Thanks to biding agreements worth $720 million. Which will enable it to get its hands on stakes in oil and gas fields offshore Louisiana. These Gulf of Mexico assets are being acquired from LLOG Exploration.

New oil & gas acquisition: Australian player entering Gulf of Mexico

Deals for the Acquisition

Karoon deemed the deals for the acquisition of a 30% interest in the Who Dat and Dome Patrol oil and gas fields. Along with related infrastructure, including the Who Dat floating production system (FPS) and a 16% stake in the Abilene field, from LLOG Exploration Offshore and LLOG Omega Holdings. In addition, the Australian firm is getting interests in adjacent acreage in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, which contains Who Dat East (40%), Who Dat West (35%), and Who Dat South (30%).

Dr. Julian Fowles, Karoon’s Managing Director and CEO, commented: “This transformation meets our strategic objectives to acquire a material, value and earnings accretive, producing asset with expansion opportunities in each of Brazil or the Gulf of Mexico (GoM). The GoM is a Tier 1 jurisdiction with a stable and well-understood regulatory and fiscal regime. The Who Dat assets provide Karoon with both geographical and asset diversification. Complementing our existing Brazilian business with a second high-quality operation.

“Production from Who Dat will help offset the natural decline from Baúna and, with a unit operating cost of less than $6 per boe in FY23, will add a high margin, long-term cash flow stream to Karoon. There are significant development and exploration opportunities in our view analogous to Who Dat within the associated acreage. These provide the potential for future infrastructure-led developments, to increase production and extend Who Dat field life. Importantly, sustaining capital requirements are low. And development and exploration activities are expected to be funded from Who Dat cash flows.”

 

Click here to read the full article
Source: Offshore Energy

If you have any questions or thoughts about the topic, feel free to contact us here or leave a comment below.